
The Creature in Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein sparks an interest in the long-lived debate of whether violence is an innate or learned trait, nature versus nurture, if you will. Is the creature created to have a violent mindset from the start, or were they aggressive actions “lashing out” as a result of an unaccepting society’s rejection? Many psychologists debate whether goodness and evil are learned or naturally occurring, this age-old debate has been a hot topic among psychologists and philosophers for centuries.
Two of the most renowned early philosophers who studied morality were Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Hobbes believed that humans were fundamentally evil and selfish beings. This contributed to his immense support of an absolute monarchy, “a system of government in which absolute power is invested in the monarch; a state governed in this way,” because if people were naturally evil, then they had no business participating in a democracy. Conversely, John Locke was quite the opposite of Hobbes. Locke believed that people were naturally reasonable, and therefore capable of managing a democracy; he championed democracy and liberality. They are differing beliefs are widely disputed and currently practiced in many countries worldwide.
The 21st century has seen exponential growth in violent crime, and only seems to be increasing in many parts of the United States; it is as if violence is a normal part of life. American popular culture glorifies violence. Modern day children are hardly sheltered and grow up looking up to aggressive villains and characters, it’s quite astounding. Psychology refers to people imitating violence after visual exposure as the violence-viewing effect. An article in the New York Times discusses how “[v]iolent crimes increased nationally [in 2017] by 4.1 percent and homicides rose by 8.6 percent, one year after violence increased by 3.9 percent and homicides jumped by 10.8 percent.” As frequency of crimes increase, more people cannot help but tune in to try and understand why such a change. Such obvious growth would not have occurred if humans were naturally evil because there would not be such an obvious jump if humans were biologically predisposed to violent behavior.
This evidence would bolster the argument that Frankenstein, assuming he had a human-like psychological mindset, was not predisposed to violence, but rather it was learned. Throughout the novel he experiences immense rejection. He is a monster, and knows of nothing else; that is his identity. Ultimately, violence is a learned trait, proven by current statistics and psychological studies of the violence-viewing effect. Unfortunately, The Creature is a disturbing combination of societal rejection and hatred: a glimpse inside of how violence begins and grows.
Sources:
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/absolute_monarchyhttps:// http://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/25/us/violent-crime-murder-chicago-increase-.html Picture: http://pattayatoday.net/features/youth-focus/a-study-on-how-television-media-can-affect-children’s-behaviour-and-if-it-has-any-connection-to-their-attitudes-and-beliefs-when-they-move-into-adulthood/





Molded Mask, Ceramic on Cardboard
Unfinished Masks, Ceramic


